funfer_fahrer
Club Guest
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2006
- Messages
- 1,928
- Points
- 0
python_dev;256241 said:I think the primary argument is not on if a malaysian is sent to space, but how.
Example:
if proton decided to start all it's production in china and import it's cars back to malaysia, can they call it a malaysian made car because the name is from Malaysia and so is the funding.
The main argument that is going on here is
Who's space program is this.
If it was a genuine space program with predefined goals set then it would be classed as such.
if it is a former F1 driver with the goal of eating nasi lemak and drinking teh tarik then is it really a space program or a taxi ride?
What is the end goal and is it realistic.
if your end goal is just to put someone in space, then this has been achieved.
if your end goal is to do something for the betterment of mankind and malaysia, then this has not yet been achieved.
IMHO, we Malaysians especially the politicians have been doing things without a proper objective. The big question is, where do we want to go from here? Remember that this is supposed to be a one-time-only launch for Malaysia, and all of the sudden the politicians and leaders got so excited that they wanted it to a continous "program". And most of the time, we did it because of pride and also to boost the self-esteem of the Malaysian people. Look at what happened to Proton? Because of "pride", the rakyat will eventually lose. When we include "pride" in whatever we do, be prepared to pay the price. Having said this, please don't get me wrong. I am not against the space program. But, we must have a clear objective. From the politicians point of view, this is very good for their political mileage. And also, Malaysia must send a man to space before 2020. Because Tun Dr. Mahathir also is ageing, well, this is definitely the best time to do this. From the rakyat's point of view, please don't waste our money unnecessarily. If we want to have a space program, then do it properly. If we have to spend, then spend.