safrul;389258 said:I have bad experience using Nikon. They are very sux for usability.
nikazwaa;389295 said:I have bad experience using Canon. They are very sux for usability.>
![]()
OSFlanker;389306 said:Please, no fanboys allowed! hahaha
Here is a picture of some gears from our recent photoshoot. 4 x Nikon D700, 1 x Canon 1Ds MK3, 1 x Fuji S5 Pro, 1 x Nikon D300, 1 x Olympus E510, lenses & external flash units : too many to count!
![]()
funfer_fahrer;389305 said:Would you mind sharing your experience?
funfer_fahrer;389308 said:I don't understand why we have to spend at least RM15K for a decent camera body when those days for a mere RM5K you can buy top-of-the-range Nikon F5. Digital sux.
ALBundy;389307 said:If strictly comparing these two cameras (D90 vs 450D), the D90 will annihilate the 450D in terms of performance. Try shooting at ISO1600, 3200.
Cheers
OSFlanker;389312 said:coz nowadays you are not buying a "camera" but a computer that can attach lenses to it!
funfer_fahrer;389316 said:Understand that bro. But, there's a thing called economies of scale. And most of the Nikons are made in Thailand summore, including lenses.
ALBundy;389321 said:It depends on the range. D90 and most of the kit lens are made in Thailand or China.
The higher models are still made in Japan, D300 and etc, plus the better lenses. You get what you paid for la bro.
Get the D700, image sensor similar size to 35mm film (and less than 15k) :top:
CHeers
OSFlanker;389313 said:But 450D can become pro already!
funfer_fahrer;389326 said:But I already invested in DX lenses. F2.8 constant summore.Die la like this man! If only I knew I would have kept all my 35mm F2.8 film lenses. (Double sux for digicams).
ALBundy;389358 said:Sell la bro, sure got buyers like nik, oswanker waiting
Yeah, now those old film lenses are soaring in prices. At YL, the 28-105mm was selling for Rm600 previously, now up to RM920. When asked why, can use for FX ma!
Cheers
OSFlanker;389313 said:But 450D can become pro already!