ALBundy said:Anyway....despite the skewed poll, more than 70% of the folks who have casted their votes believe there should be and annual fee imposed and out of the 70%, more than 70% agreed the annual fee imposed is just and fair hahahaha!
vincent said:about the poll title , what is wrong ??? it is a question and a poll to judge the result.
i really i dont understand unless is unfair to you...
tht should be a topic rite , is good to have another option says "yes but less fees" to be fair to members ...
this not to discriminate anyone here ....
OSFlanker said:The phrasing of the poll is unfortunate and points to a bias from the originator of the poll. Those who have studied statistics will know that any poll can be made to skew towards an outcome with the correct phrasing.
The poll question "Should Annual Fees be Implemented" points to a challenge on the concept of charging annual fees. Firstly, I am not aware of any registered car club which doesn't collect annual fees. Secondly, from the responses posted, entrance fee is also an issue but the poll only mentions the annual fees.
A more neutral phrasing could be as follows :
"What is your opinion on the RM150 annual membership fee and the RM150 membership entrance fee?"
with the list of alternative responses as :
1. The fees set are reasonable
2. The fees set are too high
3. The annual fee is reasonable but the entrance fee is too high
"I don't care" should not be an option as this a poll and those that don't care should not take part in any poll at all! Instead of "I don't care" should be "none of the above".
vincent said:the birth of bimmersclub.com is not to take all forumers from here to there . it is just another udmowner.com or malatbimmers.com so what about given a string and try to be cowboys ??
dont tell me anyone here cannot form their own website ????
vincent said:the birth of bimmersclub.com is not to take all forumers from here to there . it is just another udmowner.com or malatbimmers.com so what about given a string and try to be cowboys ??
dont tell me anyone here cannot form their own website ????
ALBundy said:On the contrary, I think everyone has their right to start their own club and we shouldnt judge them on their action. Everyone has their preference, some like missionary, doggy style, sideways, standing, corner of the bed and what not. Just because you like it doggy style doesnt not mean you are dog.
Of course in an ideal world, we should all unite under one huge umbrella. I suggest the committee to have an open session to explain the rationale behind the fees imposed and all forum members that are uncertain to participate in the club due to some uncertainties are welcome to attend and voice their concerns with respect to what ever issues.
XXX said:What members? nobody has paid yet so practically we have none. We need to get people to join the club first and as this was the fee structure that was earlier
agreed upon and submitted to ROS, and only members can amend the fee structure in the next AGM as such there is nothing much we can do now. Until we have members and enough of it to set a quorum for voting purposes to elect the new committee and to change the constitution, we can debate all we want and nothings gonna come out of it.So I say we do the membership drive, get the members, vote in the new committee and let the new committee work from there. So all outhere who thinks he can do better for the club pls invest RM300 in this club and hope you get a good campaign manager if you plan to be president.
Oops sorry actually we have 1 paid up member.