Menu
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Reply to thread
Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia
Download Form
Home
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
Website programming - is this true?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="popeadrian" data-source="post: 228383" data-attributes="member: 2065"><p>Hmm.....but what if the Client had asked FE (once again, using the scenario above) to handle all of this as part of the "work"....since FE as the old "hosting company" had agreed to this, would not the renewal withthe ACTUAL hosting company be part of the service? In this instance, the actual tenure of the webhosting, as far as the client is concerned, is from the date that the instructions were given to FE. Looking at it logically, for all the client knows, FE could merely be "piggybacking" on its existing server space (already purchased for itself or other customers) and thus the expiry would be before the expiration of the arragement with the Client. </p><p> </p><p>Karate's scenerio is applicable to a situation where the Client deals directly with the Hosting Company...and not with a 3rd Party.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="popeadrian, post: 228383, member: 2065"] Hmm.....but what if the Client had asked FE (once again, using the scenario above) to handle all of this as part of the "work"....since FE as the old "hosting company" had agreed to this, would not the renewal withthe ACTUAL hosting company be part of the service? In this instance, the actual tenure of the webhosting, as far as the client is concerned, is from the date that the instructions were given to FE. Looking at it logically, for all the client knows, FE could merely be "piggybacking" on its existing server space (already purchased for itself or other customers) and thus the expiry would be before the expiration of the arragement with the Client. Karate's scenerio is applicable to a situation where the Client deals directly with the Hosting Company...and not with a 3rd Party. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
Website programming - is this true?
Top
Bottom