Reply to thread

Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia Download Form

Message: <blockquote data-quote="aoch88" data-source="post: 520220" data-attributes="member: 8491">I agree with you and in fact, I don't understand what's the issue with some members here who couldn't discuss maturely? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Here's the chronology of the events:1. Everyone is comparing highway driving so I'm trying to say if it's better to put some details about mixed/urban driving? Most cars would do well for highway driving and gives good mileage. I quoted Proton Perdana as a "crap" car as an example because Perdana is indeed a high fuel consumption car for urban driving and getting stucked in the jams. Someone got touchy and defended his Proton Perdana saying it's a great car but that's fine, it is his opinion and his car. However the thing we are missing out is, how do you conclude that the consumption is indeed good without numbers? If we don't have numbers, how do we tell? Using butt-dyno or our right leg?2. Another member came and question if I even own a BMW. The joke here is if I don't own one, what's the point of coming here? Nothing better to do but instead getting useless remarks like these?If people thinks that using a proper number/measurement is NOT a good way to compare so please advice what is the best. If someone says I can do 550KM in a full tank, that is also a number <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Is it just Malaysians or people here in the forums that likes to argue without knowing what they are talking about?</blockquote>

Verification