Reply to thread

Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia Download Form

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lee36328" data-source="post: 114239" data-attributes="member: 113">I guess what's wonderful and precious about this country is free speech.  I will post my opinions, views, conjectures etc.  If it violates forum policies, moderators will do their duties of course.  Autofoam is a specific brand name, which has been quoted misleadingly to represent (or perhaps misunderstood as representing) all car foaming, including DIY off-the-shelf cans, which is unfair to the brand.  So, when Redd's thread is entitled "Autofoam lovers, please read this", can you say no one is attacking this brand?This recent addition to this discussion, in this and other forums, contained some unsubstantiated conjecture which I feel compelled to comment on, so I commented.And yes, to be perfectly balanced and fair, if I was driving the latest continental car model, and not a model almost 10 years old, I would place more credibility to the crash test rating, and think more carefully on whether to foam, and which part to foam.  (I simply can't afford the latest cars at the moment, and my car 9-year-old car is pretty crash unsafe by today's standards, with its lone airbag and all, I would hazard a guess, so it is less of a consideration for me.)And if I was driving a modern Japanese car, with all due respect to Japanese technology, I would still foam the vehicle thoroughly.DanPromote, if I crash my old car, and survive to tell the tale, I will post it here.  But even then, it is just one case, and will not prove anything conclusively.</blockquote>

Verification