Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="The Necessary" data-source="post: 114211" data-attributes="member: 302">Lee,wow, no need to get so partisan here!If you had actually read what was posted on italiaauto, you would have realised that it was &quot;musclehedz&quot; who first mentioned &quot;autofoam&quot;, and then &quot;twin_sparx&quot; warned everyone agaisnt it based on his experiences/knowledge.IF like you say; &quot;twin_sparx&quot; is saying; &quot;Trust me, I&#039;m an engineer, I make a living crashing cars, and I&#039;ve got tons of evidence, just can&#039;t share it with you because it&#039;s manufacturer&#039;s secrets. Take my word for it, stay away from foaming.&quot; (which, btw, he&#039;s not. but if that&#039;s how you read it...), then what is your post? &quot;Trust me, I&#039;m a good friend of the guy who does Autofoam, I&#039;m not an engineer, I&#039;ve no empirical evidence, BUT I&#039;ve taken alot of corners, so I know.&quot;?I think Redd had the best of intentions when he posted that information. And him not getting &quot;crucified&quot;, as you put it, is because the vast majority of us here agree with him. I&#039;m glad you&#039;re sharing your point of view, but unfortunately, it seems that your information is less reliable than Redd (or twin_sparx&#039;s) and is more concerned with defending the brand (Autofoam) than the relative merits/demerits of foaming.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="The Necessary, post: 114211, member: 302"] Lee, wow, no need to get so partisan here! If you had actually [i]read[/i] what was posted on italiaauto, you would have realised that it was "musclehedz" who first mentioned "autofoam", and then "twin_sparx" warned everyone agaisnt it based on his experiences/knowledge. [b]IF[/b] like you say; "twin_sparx" is saying; [i]"Trust me, I'm an engineer, I make a living crashing cars, and I've got tons of evidence, just can't share it with you because it's manufacturer's secrets. Take my word for it, stay away from foaming."[/i] (which, btw, he's not. but if that's how you read it...), then what is your post? "Trust me, I'm a good friend of the guy who does Autofoam, I'm not an engineer, I've no empirical evidence, [b]BUT[/b] I've taken alot of corners, so I know."? I think Redd had the best of intentions when he posted that information. And him not getting "crucified", as you put it, is because the vast majority of us here agree with him. I'm glad you're sharing your point of view, but unfortunately, it seems that your information is less reliable than Redd (or twin_sparx's) and is more concerned with defending the brand (Autofoam) than the relative merits/demerits of [b]foaming[/b]. [/QUOTE]

Verification