Reply to thread

Click here to become an Official Member of BMW Club Malaysia Download Form

Message: <blockquote data-quote="E46Fanatic" data-source="post: 114201" data-attributes="member: 81">Cold hard evidence in this area will be impossible to post in a forum like this.. both from a feasibility point of view as well as confidentiality considerations from the company he works for.  But I am sure if you are keen enough you can get in touch with him or pay him a visit to see the simulations  <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> .I have seen data and models on crash analysis for automobiles, and every part of the structure of the car has properties which are part of the model.  The behaviour and dynamics of deformation is a factor of all these individual properties to give you the outcome you would want in the case of a simulated impact.  Thats why the use of high performance computing and advanced simulation software is used for the element analysis by most if not all modern car manufacturers.  Change parts of that model, and the outcome will differ.  When parts are meant to disperse and absorb the forces do not play its role other parts of the model will behave differently and as what Twin Spark mention, the likelyhood of achieving an adhoc mangled wreck is probably what you'll get instead.How do you prove this?  Well its all in the simulation and models....  You'll need software, hardware, models and the expertise to get your proof.</blockquote>

Verification