zam zainal
Club Guest
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2010
- Messages
- 16
- Points
- 0
Hi Guys,Does anyone knew on tuning the MS42 DME? I've had most of the 'hardwares' but the tuning part make me headache!
ALBundy;601114 said:What type of software do you intend to use? Do you intend to use a standalone, piggyback or re-flash the existing siemens ECU?
ALBundy;601114 said:What type of software do you intend to use? Do you intend to use a standalone, piggyback or re-flash the existing siemens ECU?
puginfo;601342 said:since the goal is just about 0.5 bar (7.5psi) its probably cost effective to keep the original ecu and around altering the fuel map while maintaining the current ignition map. intercooling must also be addressed if not you end up using more fuel to avoid detn.
for minor alteration on the fuel map, you can add the P-FCON injector control module wired and plumbed with an extra injector located just before throttle body. so all of these has to be thot of now as it will effect yr hardware setup which you are now at. assuming you are doing a bolt on job, yr CR is at 10.2 now so this task has to be done very-very carefully!
ramsing;601355 said:this depends on the hardware, ie size of turbo etc. if he uses a gt40 at 0.5 bar, this wont be enuf. but this method is just a bandaid to get the fueling right. better option is to get it right from the start, tuning is the most critical part to the problem.
ramsing;601292 said:u should aim for tuning via the stock ecu. that's the best option. piggybacks dont work well because its trying to cheat the system, which over time will revert back towards stock. if u run standalone, be prepared for a lot of checklights and/or daily driving issues. unless the car is a track/fun car, then its ok.
i'm not sure if there's any stock ecu tuners in m'sia, singapore might have one or two.
but what turbo u're running? 0.5 bar is still dependent on the size of ur turbo. what's u're power goals?
puginfo;601342 said:since the goal is just about 0.5 bar (7.5psi) its probably cost effective to keep the original ecu and around altering the fuel map while maintaining the current ignition map. intercooling must also be addressed if not you end up using more fuel to avoid detn.
for minor alteration on the fuel map, you can add the P-FCON injector control module wired and plumbed with an extra injector located just before throttle body. so all of these has to be thot of now as it will effect yr hardware setup which you are now at. assuming you are doing a bolt on job, yr CR is at 10.2 now so this task has to be done very-very carefully!
ALBundy;601439 said:Zam, you the headers and piping all done?
To tune stock ecu may not be as easy as it seems. The tuner must be well versed with the various maps stored in the ECU. There are more than 60 over maps and he has to extract the right map and then key in the proper values. And that involved a lot of guesswork as well. Most of the tuners have a ready map for specific application like the type of turbine you using, headers and etc.
If you plan to keep the cost down the easiest way is either to install an adjustable fuel regulator (popular with the mosselman turbo those days) or an Unichip Piggyback with boost controller (all in 2500).
puginfo;601414 said:this band aid is to maintain the original ecu and to keep the cost down. what is yr definition of
" better option is to get it right from the start" can you explain?
ALBundy;601543 said:be even more difficult with a 6 cylinder engine. I suggest you get this book by Graham Bell, it's the bible for forced induction![]()
ALBundy;601468 said:It will be a challenge to fabricate the headers as yours is a right hand drive unless the turbine is mounted at the top behind the right headlight.
puginfo;601539 said:so i guess thats why the rule no.1 stays :
"do not boost a NA engine"
..........if cost is prohibitive to do it right. lets see where Zam gets with his venture.